IN THE HOPE THAT THIS MAY HELP SOMEONE ELSE, THE STORY OF MY NEIGHBORS LAWSUIT. THINGS I LEARNED, STARTING AT THE END- THE BEST PART.

Saturday, September 3, 2011

MY THOUGHTS AFTER PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS

   AFTER OUR FILING PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS, A BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF SAID OBJECTIONS, AND THEIR ANSWERS TO PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS, I COULDN'T  HELP BUT NOTICE A COUPLE THINGS.  FIRST, THE PA. I. D. NO. OF  MR. SHIRE, OUR ATTORNEY 05365    
THEN, THE PA. I. D. NO. OF MR. HASSON, THEIR ATTORNEY 63215   
   NOT A SMALL DIFFERENCE IN EXPERIENCE. THEN READING THE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS IT'S OBVIOUS THAT IT IS A HIGH QUALITY DOCUMENT.  EVERYTHING THAT IS SAID IS SUPPORTED BY LAW.  CONTRAST THAT WITH THE PLAINTIFFS ANSWER.  " PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF".  
   MEANWHILE I'M THINKING, '' YOU MAY THINK YOUR COMPLAINT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF, BUT I DON'T HAVE A CLUE WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT."   6 INCHES  ?         I  REMEMBER AFTER THE DRIVEWAY WAS REPAVED ,  BILL CATHERS COMING OVER AND POINTING TO CRACKS, 6 INCHES FROM THE EDGE, SAYING THAT HE THINKS WE EXPANDED OUR DRIVEWAY AND THOSE CRACKS INDICATE THAT THE DRIVEWAY IS SETTLE LING ALONG THE EDGE WHERE IT NEVER WAS.  BUT , I TOLD HIM I DIDN'T BELIEVE THAT AND I WALKED HIM 100 FEET DOWN THE DRIVEWAY AND SHOWED HIM CRACKS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE DRIVEWAY, ASKING HIM WHAT DOES THAT SHOW  .
   HOW COULD I POSSIBLY DEFEND MYSELF AGAINST 6 INCHES?

CATHERS ANSWER TO PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS