ORDER ON PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS

ORAL ARGUMENTS ON PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS

                                          WHAT A GRAND OLD BUILDING.

   AUGUST 17, 2006 AT THE WESTMORELAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE.  I GET THERE AT 10;15 AM , 15 MINUTES LATE, ROAD CONSTRUCTION.  JUDGE CARUSO IS THERE, AS ARE MY TWO ATTORNEYS, MR. SHIRE AND KEN BALDONIERI. AFTER THE PLAINTIFFS ATTORNEY , MR. HASSON, GETS THERE , MR. SHIRE GOES FIRST, STATING OUR FOUR OBJECTIONS.   MR. HASSON GOES NEXT AND SAYS HE'S TRYING TO SAVE THE CATHERS MONEY, THAT HE MIGHT HAVE TO GO BACK 200 YEARS TO DO AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE. HE FEELS THAT A DEED SHOWS OWNERSHIP.  MR. SHIRE PULLS OUT THE PLOT PLAN OF EAST DONORA  AND SHOWS THAT MR. HASSON ONLY HAS TO GO BACK TO 1919.  MR. SHIRE ALSO POINTS OUT THAT A DEED DOES NOT SHOW AN UNCLOUDED TITLE.  MR. SHIRE ALSO POINTED OUT TWICE, " ADVERSE POSSESSION" BEING THE ONLY CASE WHERE YOU DON'T NEED TO HAVE AN " ABSTRACT OF TITLE".  JUDGE CARUSO OPENS RULES OF COURT, AND READS, " ABSTRACT OF TITLE UPON WHICH PLAINTIFFS RELY AT LEAST FROM THE COMMON SOURCE."
   FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, AS A LAY-PERSON, THIS WAS A FIRST OPPORTUNITY TO SEE YOUR ATTORNEY AGAINST THEIR ATTORNEY.  I WAS VERY HAPPY WITH WHAT I SAW. THEY WERE WELL PREPARED.  AND,  I WAS DUMBFOUNDED  BY THE FACT THAT THE PLAINTIFFS DID NOT ATTEND.   THIS IS THEIR LAWSUIT.